To President Trump! March 9, 2026 President Trump harshly criticized the six justices who voted in favor of the Supreme Court's ruling that illegally imposed reciprocal tariffs and other measures, calling them a "national disgrace." That's an exaggeration! The Supreme Court asserted that U.S. tariff measures do not give the president the authority to impose tariffs. President Trump should "redeem his honor" with "balanced countervailing duties."

To President Trump!

March 9, 2026

President Trump harshly criticized the six justices who voted in favor of the Su-preme Court's ruling that illegally imposed reciprocal tariffs, calling them a "national disgrace." That's an exaggeration!

The Supreme Court argued that U.S. tariff measures do not give the president the authority to impose tariffs. President Trump should "restore his honor" with "bal-anced countervailing duties."

Without providing any evidence, Trump stated, "The Supreme Court is influenced by foreign interests." I believe that "balanced countervailing duties" should be es-tablished in addition to tariffs to promote "exports."

This time, President Trump immediately raised tariff rates from 10% to 15%. This has once again drawn criticism for being "inconsistent." I think the decision to raise the tariff to 15% was sound.

I believe we should buy time with Section 122 and enact a "new tariff law" to ad-dress the deficit. In that case, I believe we should enact a "New Tariff Law" incor-porating "balanced countervailing duties."

The "balanced countervailing duties" I propose would impose tariffs on the "net im-port value" of trade transactions by individual U.S. importers. Importers could re-duce their tariffs to zero by exporting.

The entire American people should unite to "eliminate the trade deficit." I'm confi-dent that American consumers will shop at "zero tariff stores." This is why they are so conscious of exports.

That's why I've repeatedly used the example of #Walmart. Walmart should encour-age Chinese exporters to "import American products," but it shouldn't force them.

When #Walmart imports from Chinese companies, WM could require Chinese ex-porters to purchase American products as a condition. Walmart would then be able to "import tariff-free."

Chinese companies explore sales outlets for American products, such as beef and brand-name goods, with the aim of exporting to Walmart. This is the business men-tality of Chinese and Japanese people.

I hope that anyone who has seen my post will understand the mechanism of my "balanced countervailing duties" and strongly urge the "#Trump Administration" to consider it. Trump should take my proposal seriously.

Trump calls the fact that there are almost no American cars on the roads in Japan a "#trade barrier," but even he would be surprised if "balanced countervailing duties" were applied.

The reason is that the more "GM Cadillacs" Nissan imports into Japan, the more Nissan cars it can export to the United States with "zero tariffs." Trump should un-derstand this logic.

The "#International Trade Administration" should strengthen its system to support exports by U.S. companies through the "balanced countervailing duties system." The United States should work to "promote exports" through "#Public-Private Part-nerships."

In the United States, the "#Exporting Companies Act" allows "joint exports" to promote exports by small and medium-sized enterprises, and many trading compa-nies exist. The Trump Administration should take advantage of this!

Once a "balanced tariff system" is established, "trading companies" will have more opportunities to thrive. They should work with importers to promote the export of American products. Go America, Go Trump.

Part 1 References

"A national disgrace" and "influenced by foreign interests"... Trump blasts the six judges who upheld the "reciprocal tariff" ruling.

https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/world/20260221-GYT1T00225/

I'll write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano