To President Trump! March 3, 2026 President Macron defended Europe's efforts to repair strained relations with the United States, stating that "we should follow Europe's example" rather than "criticize Europe." I believe Macron should establish a "#GlobalPeaceArmy." Europe should support the "#G3MA," and President Macron himself should examine the G3MA, reduce military spending to "one-tenth or even one-hundredth" of its current level, and establish a "#GlobalPeaceArmy" with the aim of realizing "a planet where humanity can thrive."

 To President Trump!

March 3, 2026

President Macron defended Europe's efforts to repair strained relations with the United States, saying it should "follow Europe's example" rather than "criticize Eu-rope." I believe Macron should establish a "#GlobalPeaceArmy."

Europe should support the #G3MA, and President Macron himself should examine the G3MA, reduce military spending to "one-tenth or even one-hundredth" of its current level, and establish a "#GlobalPeaceArmy" with the goal of realizing "a planet where humanity can thrive."

President Macron says Europe "tends to be despised, sometimes openly criticized," and has a "dilapidated, stagnant, and divided structure." He should be more con-structive than whining.

I advocate the creation of a #TripartiteMilitaryAlliance (#G3MA) between the Unit-ed States, Russia, and China. This would give the G3MA overwhelming influence over other countries, allowing them to "dominate and control" and gain status.

If the United States, Russia, and China form a military alliance and build a collective security system, the world will be unable to resist G3MA. The world will become a planet without war.

If any country resists G3MA, G3MA should eliminate that country with military force. If war is launched against G3MA, it should be countered by a global peace force.

With the G3MA tripartite agreement, the world will be able to do anything. Presi-dent Macron will be "very dissatisfied." The global peace force will be the means to that end.

I argue that the establishment of G3MA will make each country a "defensive na-tion," but at the same time, I believe that nuclear-weapon states like France should be allowed to possess nuclear weapons.

The members of the global peace force are from countries other than the three. If President Macron is dissatisfied with the decisions of #G3MA, he will engage in hos-tilities with G3MA based on the resolution of #WorldPeaceForce.

A war between #G3MA and #WorldPeaceForce would be #WorldWarThird. Common sense would predict a crushing victory for G3MA. However, the three G3MA member countries would also suffer a major backlash.

Therefore, I do not believe there will be a war between #G3MA and #WorldPeace-Force. The people of the world are not stupid. The role of the WorldPeaceForce is extremely important in restraining G3MA.

Nuclear weapons of countries such as France should be #jointly owned by #WorldPeaceForce. The WorldPeaceForce should also advance the development of nuclear weapons. Mr. Macron would likely agree.

I said there will be no war between #G3MA and #WorldPeaceForce. To achieve this, the Earth must be an economically prosperous society where people can continue to live prosperous lives.

To that end, I advocate the establishment of "#special zones." These include a "#special zone on the Mexican border," a "#special zone in Algeria," and a "#spe-cial zone in the Philippines."

To realize a "world without war," world leaders should establish a "#G3MA" and a "#global peace force," redirect "#military spending" to "#supporting the lives of citizens," and build a society where people can live prosperously. Let's realize the "G3MA" and the "#global peace force."

Part 1 References

Macron: "The world should learn from Europe, not criticize it."

https://www.afpbb.com/articles/-/3622283

I'll write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano