To President Trump! March 13, 2026 The #Governor of California specifically criticized President Trump, saying, "Now is the time to make him pay," and estimated the cost per household at ¥270,000 and demanded a refund. I think he's a jerk. President Trump enacted the #TrumpTariffs as a measure to address the U.S. #tradedeficit. I believe that if he had enacted #balancedcountervailingduties, the lawsuit wouldn't have come to fruition.

 To President Trump!

March 13, 2026

The #Governor of California specifically criticized President Trump, saying, "Now is the time to make him pay," estimating the cost per household at ¥270,000, and demanding a refund. I think he's a jerk.

President Trump enacted the #TrumpTariffs as a measure to address the U.S. trade deficit. I believe that if he had enacted #BalancedCountervailingDuty, the lawsuits wouldn't have occurred.

I think Trump should appoint staff with expertise in #tradepractice. If #Balanced-CountervailingDuty were enacted, the #TradeDeficit would be eliminated through Americans' #tradingability.

Trump should enact #BalancedCountervailingDuty in his #TradeDeficitElimina-tionBill. I think he should implement #TradeDeficitEliminationPolicy with #Ex-portPromotion in mind.

I believe that tariffs are absolutely necessary for the United States to eliminate its #trade deficit. However, I also believe that companies that make an effort to elimi-nate the trade deficit should be exempt from #tariffs.

We should create #balanced countervailing duties with companies that make an ef-fort to eliminate the #trade deficit in mind. Importers that balance their #imports and #exports and achieve a #surplus should be exempt from #tariffs.

If exporters in exporting countries and importers in the United States (including trading companies) work hard to export American products, the balance of #im-ports and #exports should be #offset, resulting in #zero tariffs.

In other words, #tariffs should be imposed on an importing company basis based on #net imports (#trade deficit), which is the amount of exports from the United States minus the amount of imports into the United States. This is a rational idea.

I have something to say to those who argue that #balanced countervailing duties will reduce tariff revenue. Reduced tariff revenue means a reduced trade deficit. The United States should be more excited about a reduced trade deficit than about tariffs.

I believe that #balancedcountervailingduties will reduce consumers' #tariffburden. If a company's tariffs are reduced to zero through #balancedcountervailingduties, other retailers will be unable to impose additional tariffs.

#balancedcountervailingduties will eliminate rising prices due to rising import prices. Prices are rising not because of tariffs, but because US companies are not making an effort to export. Consumers are being too lenient.

The US also has the #ExportAssistanceAct for Small and Medium Enterprises, which supports their exports. Small retailers can export without violating #antitrust laws. What a wonderful country!

Even importers of industrial tools can avoid tariffs by utilizing #balancedcounter-vailingduties. Trading companies should leverage the #buyingpower of Americans and use imports as an opportunity to develop export markets for US products.

This will also alleviate the #frustration of Chinese companies. The more American products Chinese companies import, the more Chinese products they can export to the US tariff-free. President Xi Jinping is laughing. Even President Trump is laugh-ing!

Those who understand my "#balancedcountervailingduties" will recognize this as "#simplelogic." By leveraging America's spending power, the "US trade deficit" can be eliminated through the efforts of importing companies.

President Trump is a businessman by trade. He should be able to understand the "#balancedcountervailingduties" proposal. It's a proposal even a monkey could un-derstand. Go America! Go Trump!

Part 1 References

California Governor Names Trump, "It's Time for You to Pay the Price"... Citing an analysis that "costs each household 270,000 yen," Demands Repayment

https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/world/20260221-GYT1T00153/

I'll write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano