To President Trump! March 26, 2026 The New York Times reported on the 11th that the Department of Defense estimates the cost of the first six days of a "war against Iran" to be at least $11.3 billion (approximately 1.8 trillion yen). This is an enormous amount. The cost of "US military operations" against Iran is steadily increasing. With no end in sight to the fighting, it is inevitable that costs will balloon even further if it drags on. It is unlikely that "US Congress" will approve an increase in "military spending."

 To President Trump!

March 26, 2026

The New York Times reported on the 11th that the Department of Defense esti-mates the cost of the first six days of a "war against Iran" to be at least $11.3 bil-lion (approximately 1.8 trillion yen). This is an enormous sum.

The cost of US military operations against Iran is steadily increasing. With no end in sight to the fighting, it is inevitable that costs will balloon further if it drags on. It is unlikely that the US Congress will approve an increase in military spending.

President Trump needs to wake up. The "war against Iran" is causing the US to suf-fer enormous losses in terms of expensive weapons and personnel, creating a ma-jor headwind for President Trump. His approval ratings continue to decline.

Ammunition accounts for a large portion of the war's cost. The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) estimates that the US spent $3.7 billion in the first 100 hours of an operation, of which $3.1 billion was mainly on ammunition. This is an outrageous situation!

The number of US casualties continues to rise. As of the 13th, 13 US soldiers had died, and as of the 10th, approximately 150 had been seriously or lightly injured. It's only a matter of time before this number exceeds 10,000.

The number of US military deaths in the Vietnam War is estimated to be over 58,000. This war against Iran will soon turn the US mainland into a battlefield.

The Vietnam War was a war with no end in sight. This war against Iran also has no end in sight. There are no mediators for a ceasefire in this US war against Iran.

I believe President Trump should directly offer to mediate a ceasefire with Russia and China. He should use the promise of lasting peace as a pretext.

To achieve a world without war, President Trump should propose the creation of a "#G3MA" military alliance between the United States, Russia, and China. Putin and Xi Jinping would likely agree.

Most importantly, under the "#G3MA," the world would become a "#exclusively de-fensive" state. Military spending would become part of the "#national social securi-ty" budget. No one should object to this.

President Trump should hold a "#secret meeting" with President Xi Jinping during his visit to China in early April. President Xi Jinping would be surprised by President Trump's "#G3MA" proposal, but would likely agree.

Afterward, President Trump should visit Russia and propose the creation of the "#G3MA" to President Putin. President Putin would also be surprised, but would likely agree. It should happen.

If Trump, Putin, and Xi Jinping jointly announce the creation of a "#Trilateral Mili-tary Alliance," the world will be "astonished." This announcement should be a "#Great Military Alliance" that will go down in world history.

"#G3MA" is not a "#Military Alliance" for waging war. Its main purpose is to make each country a "#Exclusively Defense State" and reduce military spending to "one-tenth, one-hundredth" of current levels.

The US Democrats will not be able to oppose it. They will surely express their sup-port. Even countries hostile to the US, Russia, and China will not be able to say "no."

Of course, neither Ukraine nor Iran can oppose the creation of "#G3MA." #Trump, #Putin, and #XiJinping should achieve a "#GreatAchievement" that will go down in history!

Part 1 References

US War Spending on Iran Estimates: 1.8 Trillion Yen in the First Six Days

https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/world/20260315-GYT1T00019/

I will write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano