To President Trump! March 25, 2026 According to the Financial Times, France and Italy are moving towards initiating talks with Iran to allow their ships to pass through the Strait of Hormuz, aiming for a negotiated resolution. I believe President Trump should not interfere. France and Italy are not directly involved in the military conflict, and both countries are seeking a negotiated solution with Iran. I believe their stance is a model of peaceful diplomacy.

 To President Trump!

March 25, 2026

According to the Financial Times, France and Italy are reportedly moving towards initiating talks with Iran to allow their ships to pass through the Strait of Hormuz, aiming for a negotiated resolution. I believe President Trump should not interfere.

France and Italy are not directly involved in the military conflict, and both countries are seeking a negotiated solution with Iran. I believe their stance is a model of peaceful diplomacy.

Earlier this week, White House press secretary Leavitt emphasized to the public that gasoline prices had plummeted and could fall below pre-attack levels. The pub-lic will likely consider this fake news.

She promised that the rise in gasoline prices would be temporary. There's a Japa-nese proverb that says, "Lying can cost you a thousand needles." She should be ashamed of her false public relations.

On the 12th, US President Trump shifted his focus from maintaining low gasoline prices to claiming that "rising oil prices" would bring "enormous profits to the US." What a ridiculous claim!

"Rising oil prices" will "widen the US trade deficit." Rising oil prices increase total import costs. In other words, "attacks on Iran" will "widen the trade deficit."

"Rising oil prices" can also be a "positive factor" against the dollar (#stronger dol-lar) due to expectations of "improvement in the oil export balance." Is this Presi-dent Trump's aim?

If "rising oil prices" are coupled with a "stronger dollar," import costs will rise fur-ther, US export competitiveness will decline, and the "trade deficit is likely to widen again." Americans will suffer even more. The "midterm elections" will be a terrifying outcome for the Republican Party.

As a measure to address the US "structural deficit," I propose the creation of a "balanced countervailing duty" that would tax the "net imports" of "importing com-panies," in parallel with the implementation of the "#Trump tariffs."

I believe that the "balanced countervailing duty" should be used to leverage the "#Trump tariffs," stimulate exports, and "eliminate the trade deficit." It would also eliminate inflation caused by tariffs.

My proposal for the creation of the "balanced countervailing duty" supports "#Trump's tariff policy." I don't understand why President Trump hasn't adopted my proposal.

If President Trump creates the "balanced countervailing duty," Americans will strive to export American products to "effectively eliminate" the "#Trump tariffs."

I propose the creation of the "balanced countervailing duty" almost daily. Those who understand should attend Trump's rallies and strongly urge him to implement the "balanced countervailing duty."

If the "balanced countervailing duty" is implemented, Americans will realize the im-portance of exporting American products. America eliminates its "#trade deficit" surprisingly easily.

Trump should stop his "#hightariff threats" and say this: If you want to export to America tariff-free, you should import American products! Tariffs should be zero on the amount that balances exports and imports.

Trump should introduce "#balancecountervailingtariffs" to boost exports of Ameri-can products and effectively make "Trump tariffs" zero. Go America, go Trump!

Part 1 References

France and Italy reportedly preparing negotiations with Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz

https://x.gd/ifFA7X

I will write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano