To President Trump! May 16, 2025 The Japanese government is considering a plan to increase the upper limit of the number of preferential treatment measures by simplifying the procedures for safety inspections of imported automobiles, as President Trump has pointed out "non-tariff barriers such as safety standards." So how many? The simplification of procedures limits the number of imported automobiles per year to 5,000 per model. There is a proposal within the government to double this. The Trump administration should demand "unlimited."

To President Trump!

Weekday edition, May 16, 2025

The Japanese government is considering a plan to increase the upper limit of the number of preferential treatment measures by simplifying the procedures for safety inspections of imported automobiles, as President Trump has pointed out "non-tariff barriers such as safety standards." So how many?

The simplification of procedures limits the number of imported automobiles per year to 5,000 per model. There is a proposal within the government to double this. The Trump administration should demand "unlimited."

I proposed this in the May 6 edition. Cadillac's "annual sales volume" in Japan in 2024 will be only 449 units. This number is also decreasing year by year. Non-tariff barriers are "to stop it now."

As Trump also points out, Japanese people want the "vehicle inspection system" to be stopped, but this cannot be called a "non-tariff barrier" because it applies to all vehicles registered in Japan.

I propose that GM and Nissan form a sales partnership and sell each other's vehi-cles worldwide in a complementary relationship. First, do this in Japan and America.

Nissan's minicars will be sold in America at GM dealerships. GM's luxury cars will be sold in Japan at GM dealerships. Nissan should risk its company's future selling them.

Nissan in Japan will sell GM's Cadillacs and other vehicles at Nissan dealerships na-tionwide. 5,000 units per model is too few per year to import. Nissan will sell more.

GM in the US will sell Nissan's minicars at GM dealerships nationwide. America should approve Japanese minicars on a trial basis and allow their import and sale.

In the future, minicars should become the US standard. In order to support the "sales alliance between GM and Nissan," the US and Japanese governments should make the alliance vehicles "tariff-free."

The Trump administration should also make the Japanese government enact a law to "make a certain percentage of official cars American cars" for national and local governments. American cars should be sold by the force of the law.

Cadillac's "annual sales" in Japan in 2024 will be only 449 units. Nissan and GM should discuss with the Trump administration how to increase this number by 100 times in at least "one or two years."

My next target is Russia. I have proposed selling "Russian energy" to Europe "via the United States" on paper. In return, Russia has proposed importing American products with much of the payment.

The "top" American products that Russia purchases from the United States are "ve-hicles." At that time, Nissan will rebuild its sales system in Russia and sell "GM cars" as well.

Nissan is struggling with a late start in EVs and hybrid cars and declining sales. Nis-san should try to recover its performance by making GM's large luxury cars its top-of-the-line cars.

The Trump administration should see GM as the face of America and "return" it to the No. 1 automaker in the world. To do this, Trump should allow Nippon Steel to acquire US Steel. GM needs Nippon Steel's automotive steel sheets.

Part 1 Reference Materials

Government considers doubling "simplified inspection quota" for imported cars... Appeal to Trump who advocates non-tariff barriers

https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/politics/20250428-OYT1T50147/

I'll write again tomorrow.

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp