To President Trump! May 20, 2025 Zelensky said, "Nothing can be agreed upon in three days," and rejected Russia's 72-hour ceasefire. Putin only called for it for the "commemoration ceremony of the 80th anniversary of the victory over Germany." Zelensky seems to be "misunderstood." Of course, it is impossible to "restore" a "combat readiness" in three days.

To President Trump!

Weekday edition, May 20, 2025

Zelensky said, "Nothing can be agreed upon in three days," and rejected Russia's 72-hour ceasefire. Putin only called for it for the "commemoration ceremony of the 80th anniversary of the victory over Germany."

Zelensky seems to be "misunderstood." Of course, it is impossible to "restore" a "combat readiness" in three days.

Russia is calling for a ceasefire, but if it is rejected, it will just attack. Russia's aim seems to be to make Ukraine surrender unconditionally.

Russia's "so-called fundamental cause" is the "neutralization," "demilitarization," and "denazification" of Ukraine. This is the same as the pacifist Trump.

In addition to this, it is thought that the four elements of dealing with the territorial issue over the occupied territories will have a great significance in the future cease-fire. It is "super difficult."

Of course, "neutralization from NATO" is an absolute condition. Another thing about disarmament, NATO is against disarming Ukraine!

Now, let's go back to my proposal. Russia is proposing to create a Kurdish state be-tween Ukraine and the Russian-occupied territories and give it to wandering Kurds.

This "Kurdish state" will be recognized as a member of Russia's "Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS)". This is the same as giving the Crimean Peninsula to Ukraine "as long as Ukraine is a CIS member state".

In the future, if the "Kurdish state" leaves the "CIS", it will return to "Russian terri-tory" just like the current Crimean Peninsula. However, I think this is the last chance for the Kurds to have a state.

I think the "buffer state problem" should be resolved by handing over half of Ukraine's territory to Russia, and Russia giving the other half to wandering Kurds as a "Kurdish state".

It is a punishment for Ukraine provoking "Russia" and starting a "war". Zelensky became president on a promise to resolve territorial disputes with Russia through war.

Zelensky is determined to win the war against Russia with the help of the "power of the West." NATO will not allow Ukraine to join. NATO is using Ukraine for "Eastern Invasion."

Trump is "involved" in Ukraine to avoid "World War III" with Russia. But the media only "blames" Trump.

Many Western media outlets are insane. People in Western countries should sup-port Trump to avoid "World War III."

Clever Trump has changed the world's discussion with the "Trump Tariffs." Good luck, President Trump.

Part 1 References

President Zelensky: "Nothing can be agreed upon in three days" - Ukrainian media denies Russia's 72-hour ceasefire

https://newsdig.tbs.co.jp/articles/-/1894136?display=1

100 days after President Trump's inauguration, no concrete progress toward ending the invasion of Ukraine

https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20250504/k10014796821000.html

I'll write again tomorrow.

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/