To British Prime Minister
2025-04-01: Weekday edition,
"President Putin and President Trump" have finished two hours of negotiations. The White House announced that the two leaders agreed to stop attacks on energy fa-cilities and infrastructure and to begin a ceasefire. Good.
President Putin supported President Trump's idea of a 30-day "Russia and Ukraine" mutual negation "for attacks on energy infrastructure" and immediately issued such an order to the military.
President Putin pointed out problems with the 30-day ceasefire proposal proposed by the United States and accepted by Ukraine, and did not accept it.
It seems that the special envoy "did not go with" the "answers to the problems" that Russia had communicated in advance. To be honest, "I could not answer them."
In a statement released by the White House on the 18th, it said about the process toward a ceasefire, "The two leaders agreed that the movement toward peace should begin with a halt to attacks on energy facilities and infrastructure." I think this is easy to understand.
President Putin emphasized the complete cessation of foreign military and intelli-gence support to Ukraine as an important condition for a resolution. This is also clearly stated in the Minsk Agreement. The Minsk Agreement was a fraud, but this time the European willing countries will not accept it.
President Putin also said that it is necessary to consider the root causes of the cri-sis and Russia's legitimate security interests.
He pointed out issues such as the need to not accept the 30-day ceasefire pro-posed by the United States and accepted by Ukraine, and not give Ukraine a grace period to reorganize its military posture. I think that is natural.
At the Middle East Conference, we will immediately negotiate a ceasefire in the Black Sea, a complete ceasefire, and permanent peace. I think that is a good idea.
The United States and Russia agreed to set up a "group of experts" to resolve the Ukrainian conflict. I believe that the group of experts from the United States and Russia will be able to come up with a concrete solution.
I think the phone call was successful. I think the "sending of Trojan Horse troops" as claimed by France and Germany has disappeared. I think Macron's claim of "French nuclear proliferation" has also been denied.
I think European citizens have been "liberated" a little from the fear of "nuclear war." A "team of US and Russian experts" should negotiate and create a "realistic ceasefire plan."
Europe will send troops to Ukraine to prevent Russian invasion. Russia will make Ukraine an unarmed neutral country to prevent European invasion. Everyone! What do you think is different?
My proposal is the key. Part of the Ukrainian territory should be given to the "wan-dering Kurds" as the "State of Kurdistan," and the "State of Kurdistan" should be-come a "buffer zone" between Europe and Russia.
President Trump, please give instructions to the review team. Please try a little harder! Thank you.
Part 1 Citations and References
US and Russian leaders agree to stop attacks on energy facilities and start them, Ukraine situation
https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20250319/k10014753961000.html
I will write again tomorrow.
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
No comments:
Post a Comment