To British Prime Minister
2025-02-11: Weekday edition,
If the "Palestinians in Gaza" are "immigrated" to the "Philippine Special Zone", President Trump's "philanthropic spirit" will be put to good use. And the British economy will be revived. Above all, the "Palestinians" will have a bright future.
The "Palestinians in Gaza" will be accepted into the "Philippine Special Zone" with "temporary British immigration status". They will work as "low-wage workers" in the "Special Zone".
The "Palestinians" will learn "English" and "British lifestyle" while working. Those who have acquired these and are recognized as being able to coexist with the Brit-ish will be given "work visas" for the UK and the Philippines.
Therefore, the descendants of Palestinians can become the Prime Minister of the UK or the President of the Philippines. Therefore, the "first generation Palestinians" will work hard in the "Special Zone".
President Trump should discuss the idea of the "Special Zone" with the British Prime Minister and the Philippine President. By establishing a "special zone", the Philippines can become one of the world's leading factories.
The international community will condemn Israel and the US for expelling Palestini-ans from Palestine. The Jewish communities in the US and UK should support and make the "special zone" a success, with their own honor at stake.
The location of the Philippine "special zone" will be discussed between the UK, the US and the Philippines, but I would like to recommend Mindanao as the first candi-date.
The reason is that while 83% of the population of the Philippines is Catholic, 10% is Christian, and 5% is Muslim, in Mindanao Muslims make up more than 20% of the population.
I think the "Philippine special zone" should be a fenced area in Mindanao. Of course, "temporary immigrants" are not allowed to leave the "island".
The population of Mindanao is about 18.2 million. It is the second largest island in the Philippines and accounts for about 24% of the total population of the Philippines. Mindanao has a free port and special economic zone, which are rare outside of Lu-zon. A "special zone" will be created here.
British companies will mainly build factories in the "special zone". Many factories from around the world, including the UK, will move in. The reason is that the wages of "temporary immigrants" in the "special zone" are "cheaper than China".
In the UK, high value-added parts and materials will be produced and "exported" to the "special zone in the Philippines". Products are manufactured in the "special zone in the Philippines" and exported to "Southeast Asia, Pacific Rim countries", etc.
The "special zone in the Philippines" will also manufacture products on the premise that they will compete with products from "BRICS such as China". Therefore, ex-ports to mainland China are also in mind.
If exports from the Philippines increase, the production of "parts and materials" in the UK will also increase. The UK will be able to enjoy a "stable economic boom" for the first time in a long time. The British people will be grateful to the "Palestini-ans" in the "special zone".
Part 1 Citations and References
Mindanao
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mindanao
I'll write again tomorrow.
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment