To British Prime Minister
April 22, 2025 (weekday edition)
Musk sharply criticized Navarro, a senior advisor to the president, calling him a "re-al idiot." A "public debate" is brewing in the White House.
Musk said about Navarro, "It's not good to get a PhD in economics from Harvard." He also said, "The result is that ego will outweigh your ability." He, too! He was free to say whatever he wanted.
The "foreshadowing" was Navarro's remarks. He, too, was free to say whatever he wanted. Navarro described Tesla as "not a car manufacturer, but an assembler."
Navarro criticized Tesla for simply importing parts from overseas and assembling car bodies. Everyone, the question "who is the idiot?" is important.
Navarro went on to say, "I understand that they want cheap foreign parts. But what we want is domestic production, including parts." I think this is an important point.
Navarro expressed the view that "Tesla's business model" is incompatible with the "revival of manufacturing" that the Trump administration is aiming for. That's right! I also think that "production and sales" of "EVs" should be banned from the United States.
Musk countered by saying, "Tesla is the manufacturer with the highest percentage of 'American-made parts'" and "Navarro is dumber than a bag of bricks." What is a "bag of bricks"?
Japanese people don't understand the metaphor "dumber than a bag of bricks." It's become such a hot topic that it may become this year's "buzzword of the year." I found it on Yahoo! Answers.
The expression "dumber than a bag of bricks" used by Musk means "dumber than a bag of hammers" in English. This is a metaphor for "extreme stupidity, low intelli-gence."
"Bag of bricks" and "bag of hammers" mean "inanimate and unintelligent," so it is an expression that strongly suggests that the other person is "extremely low intelli-gence."
In English, such metaphors are sometimes used to insult a person's intelligence. This expression is very rude and offensive.
I support "hydrogen cars" instead of "EVs". In the United States, the home appli-ance division of "GE" and other companies has "disappeared". Japan used to be good at "home appliances".
But now it is in danger of "disappearing". In the "analog era" of home appliances, all parts were manufactured and assembled in-house.
With the advent of digital home appliances, parts have become generic parts, and anyone can easily obtain parts with the same performance. The same is true in the automobile industry.
Many parts of "gasoline cars" are manufactured in-house. "EVs" simply purchase and assemble "generic products".
Everyone should understand that at the beginning, Navarro stated that "Tesla's business model" is incompatible with the "revival of manufacturing" that the Trump administration aims for. This is the essence of the problem. More tomorrow.
Part 1 References
Musk openly criticizes presidential advisor over tariff issue, calling him a "real idiot"
https://mainichi.jp/articles/20250409/k00/00m/030/052000c
I'll write again tomorrow.
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
❤Click below to read the full article!
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
No comments:
Post a Comment