To British Prime Minister
2025-01-15: Weekday edition.
I have been proposing that illegal immigrants be accepted as "temporary immi-grants" in "special zones". I have been proposing that temporary immigrants be employed as low-wage workers while receiving education.
After completing their education, "temporary immigrants" will be "released" from the "special zones" to various parts of the United States with "general work qualifi-cations". The number of "immigrants" to be "released" will vary depending on the labor demand in the United States.
On November 20, the Texas government announced its intention to provide 1,400 acres (567 hectares) of land along the Mexican border to President-elect Trump as a site for the construction of facilities to house illegal immigrants. For the sake of explanation, we will "provisionally" call this land the "special zone".
The "special zone" provided by Texas will be used to build facilities and factories for "temporary immigrants". If this were to be "concretely" and "considered", "hun-dreds" or "thousands" of land would be needed.
The "special zone" is surrounded by a wall, so no one can leave. It gives Texas a sense of security. Tax revenues can also be expected. Illegal immigrants can be-come "temporary immigrants", earn an income and become "happy".
"Temporary immigrants" in the "special zone" receive low wages. However, "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education" are free. The source of this funding is the commission for "ordering" raw materials for the "factory" through "BtoB". And the commission for selling the manufactured products through "BtoB" and "BtoC".
The appeal of the "special zone" is that it can employ "low-wage workers" and is part of the "US domestic market". "Factories" gather here "like a storm" not only from within the US but from all over the world. Trump is "laughing out loud". This is "MAGA".
I think it would be good to require factories in the "special zone" to "export" a cer-tain percentage. What the US needs is to "export" and have a "trade balance" in the black.
There is another meaning to confining "temporary immigrants" to the "special zone" and employing them. That is to raise wages in areas of the US outside the "special zone". This will make life easier for American workers, as citizens will no longer be competing with "temporary immigrants."
This also applies to the "special zones" in Algeria and the "special zones" in Aus-tralia. "Special zones" are the best policy to solve the problem of illegal immigrants and refugees.
"Temporary immigrants" can be paid higher wages "by that amount" without providing "food, clothing, shelter, medical care, and education" for free, but this will raise the average wage in the United States.
The rise in average wages is the root cause of inflation. That's why we substitute welfare benefits. I think that's better for "temporary immigrants."
"Special zones" cannot produce "products that can compete" with Chinese products just by having low wages. They always need the latest production equipment. This production equipment will be provided by "AI robots" in the Rust Belt.
China's exports are highly competitive because they are produced with the latest equipment. In the past, Chinese government authorities banned the import of used equipment from Japan and forced the introduction of the latest equipment.
Technology is improving every day. The equipment used in factories in the US "special zones" is now the latest and is likely to be "more productive" than Chinese products. Therefore, China is accelerating the "depreciation" of its equipment by overproducing and exporting cheaply. This is free competition.
Part 1 Citations and References
[US Regime Change] Texas promises to provide vast tracts of land to the next Trump administration for the construction of illegal immigrant detention facilities
https://www.bbc.com/japanese/articles/c4gm4gz0d00o
I'll write again tomorrow.
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
No comments:
Post a Comment