To President Trump! 2025-04-02: Trump posted on his social networking site. It is seen as part of a move to prose-cute political opponents as promised, and it is inevitable that a debate will arise over the constitutional clause that provides for the president's pardon power. That's a good thing!

 To President Trump!

2025-04-02: Weekday edition,

On the 17th, US President Trump claimed that the "preventative pardons" granted by former President Biden to members of the House Select Committee investigating the January 2021 attack on the US Capitol by Trump supporters were "invalid." Trump, hang in there for democracy!

Trump posted on his social networking site. It is seen as part of a move to prose-cute political opponents as promised, and it is inevitable that a debate will arise over the constitutional clause that provides for the president's pardon power. That's a good thing!

Trump should have a big debate and protect American democracy. Trump should also use his "excessive presidential power."

Trump was referring to the members of the House Select Committee that investi-gated the attack on the Capitol. In a report compiled at the end of 2022, the com-mittee recommended to the Department of Justice that Trump be prosecuted for inciting and aiding insurrection, among other charges.

This is a disgrace to America. Those involved should be "investigated at the highest level." The Japanese judiciary is abusing the crime of aiding and abetting. Mr. Trump, let's fight together!

Later, Trump was indicted on charges of obstructing vote counting in the 2020 presidential election, but he won last year's presidential election and was not in-dicted. If he is shameless, those involved should be investigated.

On the 17th, US President Trump posted on social media that the pardon given by former President Biden as a preventive measure to lawmakers who pursued Trump's responsibility for the January 2021 attack on the US Capitol was "invalid." Great, go for it!

He then declared retaliation, saying that the pardon would be "investigated at the highest level." The incident was "fabricated" by Biden. If he says otherwise, the pardon should be "investigated at the highest level."

Biden is dirty! Just before leaving office in January this year, Biden granted preemptive pardons to members of the House Select Committee investigating Trump's responsibility for the Capitol attack, including Democratic and Republican lawmakers, staff, and witnesses, exempting them from the committee's activities and protecting them from prosecution by the Trump administration.

The American people should bring them to justice. Other individuals pardoned in-clude five of Biden's relatives, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Mil-ley, and former Chief Medical Adviser Fauci, who led the COVID-19 response in both the Trump and Biden administrations.

During the election campaign, Trump considered these people "enemies" and claimed he would retaliate if elected. Trump should keep his "election promises."

The media, which was complicit in Biden's crimes, is also responsible. The media should "campaign" to "investigate" those involved at the highest level.

The Trump administration should also fight the "power of the media." The media should tell the truth. The media should not cooperate with the "deep state." Trump, please "make every effort" to "restore democracy." Thank you.

Part 1 Citations and References

Trump claims that former Biden administration pardons are "invalid" - Targeting House Special Committee investigating Capitol attack

https://www.sankei.com/article/20250318-PRZ52F6U5BI23JLRSDJNZPBLHE/

US President Trump declares investigation into political opponents, claims preven-tive pardons are "invalid"

https://www.jiji.com/jc/article?k=2025031800193&g=int

I'll write again tomorrow.

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp